Talking past each other: Chinese EFL teachers' understanding of extensive reading
Keywords:
Extensive reading in China, Teacher cognition, attitudes toward ER, understanding of ER, implicit learning in ERAbstract
Researchers have long been asking the question: Why aren’t teachers doing Extensive Reading (ER)? A lack of knowledge on ER has been proposed as one of the reasons, but there is a scarcity of studies investigating teacher cognition in ER. Using quantitative questionnaires and qualitative interviews, this study examined attitudes and understanding of ER among a group of Chinese college professors. The results showed that these professors held a strong positive attitude toward ER. However, they looked down upon simplified readers, and regarded extensive reading as a means for linguistic study instead of a way for information or enjoyment. Because of these misconceptions, the ER in the mind of the participants resembled more intensive reading done by their students independently. The study revealed an urgent need for teachers in the Chinese EFL context to learn what ER really is and why it works.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).